|
|
@ -1,26 +1,34 @@ |
|
|
|
It is a well known fact that a fast website is critical towards having high user retention. |
|
|
|
Google looks favorable upon websites which are well optimized and fast. If you are using |
|
|
|
a CMS like WordPress or Wix, a lot of optimization is done automatically. If you like to |
|
|
|
build stuff from scratch like me, there is a ton of work required to optimize a website. |
|
|
|
It is a well-known fact that a fast website is critical towards having high user |
|
|
|
retention. Google looks favorable upon websites which are well optimized and |
|
|
|
fast. If you are using a CMS like WordPress or Wix, a lot of optimization is |
|
|
|
done automatically. If you like to build stuff from scratch like me, there is a |
|
|
|
ton of work required to optimize a website. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This post will cover the 8 things that I did to decrease the load time of this node blog |
|
|
|
by two seconds. |
|
|
|
This post will cover the 8 things that I did to decrease the load time of this |
|
|
|
node blog by two seconds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### After Optimization |
|
|
|
![Website Speed After Improvements](media/websiteOptimization/beforeImprovements.png) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Website Speed After Improvements](media/a6594f978c7925bcf3194a1c97029bd3.png) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Website Speed After Improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Before Optimization |
|
|
|
![Website Speed Before Improvements](media/websiteOptimization/beforeImprovements.png) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Website Speed After Improvements](media/a6594f978c7925bcf3194a1c97029bd3.png) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Website Speed Before Improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 1: Optimize Images |
|
|
|
1: Optimize Images |
|
|
|
------------------ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since images are the largest portion of a website's size, optimizing and reducing the |
|
|
|
size of images will greatly decrease load time. In a perfect web development world, everyone would |
|
|
|
use SVG images which are extremely small and don't need compression. However, since most of us |
|
|
|
use PNG and JPEG images I wrote a script to automatically optimize images for the web. |
|
|
|
Since images are the largest portion of a website's size, optimizing and |
|
|
|
reducing the size of images will decrease load time. In a perfect web |
|
|
|
development world, everyone would use SVG images which are extremely small and |
|
|
|
don't need compression. I wrote a script to automatically optimize JPEG and PNG |
|
|
|
images for the web since most people don’t use SVG images. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
#!/bin/bash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Simple script for optimizing all images for a website |
|
|
@ -44,38 +52,43 @@ for folder in "${folders[@]}"; do |
|
|
|
optipng -o7 -preserve "$f" |
|
|
|
done |
|
|
|
done |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When ran, this script will go through the img, and entries folder recursively and optimize all |
|
|
|
the images in there. If an image is more than 690px wide, it will scale it down to save size. In |
|
|
|
most cases, it is useless to have images with a width greater than 690 because it will just get |
|
|
|
scaled by the client's web browser. |
|
|
|
When ran, this script will go through the ‘img, and ‘entries’ folder recursively |
|
|
|
and optimize all the images in there. If an image is more than 690px wide, it |
|
|
|
will scale it down to save size. In most cases it is useless to have images with |
|
|
|
a width greater than 690px because it will just get scaled by the client's web |
|
|
|
browser. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running a Debian based linux distro, you can download the |
|
|
|
dependencies for this script with the following commands: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running a Debian based linux distro, you can download the dependencies for this script with |
|
|
|
the following commands: |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
apt-get install jpegoptim |
|
|
|
apt-get install optipng |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goal of this script is to make most of the images under 100kb for the web. It is ok to have |
|
|
|
a few images above 100k, however, you should really avoid having images above 200kb. |
|
|
|
The goal of this script is to make most of the images under 100kb for the web. |
|
|
|
It is ok to have a few images above 100kb; however, you should really avoid |
|
|
|
having images above 200kb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: Take advantage of Async calls |
|
|
|
-------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 2: Take advantage of Async calls |
|
|
|
One of the largest benefits of Node is its Async abilities where code is |
|
|
|
executed in a multi-threaded fashion. This can become a callback hell if not |
|
|
|
handled correctly, but, with good code structure it can become very useful. When |
|
|
|
code is executed in parallel, you can decrease run time by doing other stuff |
|
|
|
while waiting on costly file IO and database calls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the largest benefits of node is its async abilities where code is executed in a |
|
|
|
multi-threaded fashion. This can become a callback hell if not handled correctly, but, with |
|
|
|
good code structure it can become very easy. When code is executed in parallel, you can greatly |
|
|
|
decrease run time by doing other stuff while waiting on costly file IO or database calls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with async code is that it is hard to coordinate. Node has a lot of ways to handel |
|
|
|
synchronization, but, I prefer to use [Promises](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise) |
|
|
|
. Here is a simple example where async code can become inefficient. |
|
|
|
The problem with async code is that it is hard to coordinate. Node has a lot of |
|
|
|
ways to handel synchronization, but, I prefer to use |
|
|
|
[Promises](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise). |
|
|
|
Here is a simple example where Async code can be misused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Code Async: |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
Promise.all([includes.printHeader(), |
|
|
|
require(file).main(filename, request), |
|
|
|
includes.printFooter()]).then(function(content) |
|
|
@ -86,10 +99,11 @@ Promise.all([includes.printHeader(), |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
console.log(err); |
|
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad Async Code: |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
includes.printHeader(res).then(function() |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
return require(file).main(res, filename, request); |
|
|
@ -100,20 +114,22 @@ includes.printHeader(res).then(function() |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
console.log(err); |
|
|
|
}) |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first example three blocks of async code are executed in parallel and in the second example |
|
|
|
three blocks of async code are executed one after another. Many people may initially do the second |
|
|
|
option because it may seem like you have to create and render the footer after you render the header |
|
|
|
and body of the page. |
|
|
|
In the first example three blocks of async code are executed in parallel and in |
|
|
|
the second example three blocks of async code are executed one after another. |
|
|
|
Many people may initially do the second option because it may seem like you must |
|
|
|
create and render the footer after you render the header and body of the page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A great way to handel async calls is by having most of your methods returning promises which resolve to |
|
|
|
the HTML or DB information that they produce. When you run Promise.all, it returns an array of the |
|
|
|
objects which enables you to preserve the order ie header, body, footer. After you do this for all of |
|
|
|
your code, it creates a "perfect" async tree which actually runs very fast. |
|
|
|
A great way to handel async calls is by having most of your methods returning |
|
|
|
promises which resolve to the HTML or DB information that they produce. When you |
|
|
|
run Promise.all, it returns an array of the objects which enables you to |
|
|
|
preserve the order ie header, body, footer. After you do this for all your code, |
|
|
|
it creates a "perfect" async tree which actually runs very fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another Good Async Example: |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
/** |
|
|
|
* Calls posts and sidebar modules to render blog contents in order |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
@ -134,66 +150,70 @@ main: function(requestURL) |
|
|
|
}) |
|
|
|
}); |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 3: Client Side Caching |
|
|
|
3: Client-Side Caching |
|
|
|
---------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client side caching is where the client's web browser stores static content they |
|
|
|
receive from your website. For example, |
|
|
|
if a client caches a downloaded css style sheet, they won't have to download it again for the next page |
|
|
|
they visit on your website with that style sheet. |
|
|
|
Client-side caching is where the client's web browser stores static content they |
|
|
|
download from your website. For example, if a client caches a CSS style sheet, |
|
|
|
they won't have to download it again for the next page they visit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should cache all images, Javascript and css files since those typically don't change. |
|
|
|
It is a good idea to set the expiration date of the cache to be something longer than a week, I typically |
|
|
|
set mine for a month. |
|
|
|
You should cache all images, JavaScript and CSS files since those typically |
|
|
|
don't change. It is a good idea to set the expiration date of the cache to be |
|
|
|
something longer than a week, I typically set mine for a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order for a web browser to accept and cache files, you must set some tags in the HTTP header of the |
|
|
|
response which you send to the client. In this header you must specify the content type, some cache variables |
|
|
|
like its max age. You also must assign a ETag to the header to give the client a way to verify the content |
|
|
|
of the cache. This enables the client to detect if there was a change to the file. Some people set the ETag |
|
|
|
equal to the version of the stylesheet or javascript, but, it is far easier to just set it equal to the hash of the |
|
|
|
file. I use md5 to hash the files since it is fast and I'm not worried about hash collisions for this particular |
|
|
|
application. |
|
|
|
For a web browser to accept and cache files, you must set some tags in the HTTP |
|
|
|
header. In the HTTP header you must specify the content type, cache variables |
|
|
|
like max age. You also must assign a ETag to the header to give the client a way |
|
|
|
to verify the content of the cache. This enables the client to detect if there |
|
|
|
was a change to the file and download it again. Some people set the ETag equal |
|
|
|
to the version of the stylesheet or JavaScript, but, it is far easier to just |
|
|
|
set it equal to the hash of the file. I use md5 to hash the files since it is |
|
|
|
fast and I'm not worried about hash collisions for this application. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can do this in NGINX if you use it to serve static files, but, you can also do it |
|
|
|
in Node. |
|
|
|
You can do this in NGINX if you use it to serve static files, but, you can also |
|
|
|
do it directly in Node. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Caching CSS |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
var eTag = crypto.createHash('md5').update(content).digest('hex'); |
|
|
|
result.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/css', 'Cache-Control': |
|
|
|
'public, max-age=2678400', 'ETag': '"' + eTag + '"', |
|
|
|
'Vary': 'Accept-Encoding'}); |
|
|
|
result.write(content); |
|
|
|
result.end(); |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Caching Images |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
var eTag = crypto.createHash('md5').update(content).digest('hex'); |
|
|
|
result.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'image/png', |
|
|
|
'Cache-Control': 'public, max-age=2678400', |
|
|
|
'ETag': '"' + eTag + '"'}); |
|
|
|
result.write(content); |
|
|
|
result.end(); |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 4: Server Side Caching |
|
|
|
4: Server-Side Caching |
|
|
|
---------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even with the best async server, there are still ways to improve performance. If |
|
|
|
you cache all the static pages that you generate in a HashMap, you can quickly access |
|
|
|
it for the next web user without ever having to query the database or read files. |
|
|
|
you cache all the static pages that you generate in a HashMap, you can quickly |
|
|
|
access it for the next web user without ever having to query the database or |
|
|
|
read files. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Ex: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
const cache = require('memory-cache'); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var html = cache.get(filename); |
|
|
|
if(html == null) |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
// Generate page contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promise.all([includes.printHeader(), |
|
|
|
require(file).main(filename, request), |
|
|
|
includes.printFooter()]).then(function(content) |
|
|
@ -208,59 +228,73 @@ else |
|
|
|
res.write(html); |
|
|
|
res.end(); |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found that it is the fastest to cache everything from static html pages, CSS, JavaScript, |
|
|
|
and Images. For a larger site this may consume a boat load of ram, but, storing images in a HashMap |
|
|
|
greatly reduce load time since you don't need to read the file from a disk. For a smaller node application |
|
|
|
like my blog the benefits of using the server side cache nearly cut my load time in half. |
|
|
|
I found that it is the fastest to cache everything from static html pages, CSS, |
|
|
|
JavaScript, and images. For a larger site this may consume a boat load of ram, |
|
|
|
but, storing images in a HashMap reduces load time since you don't need to read |
|
|
|
the file from a disk. For my blog, server-side caching nearly cut my load time |
|
|
|
in half. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure that you don't accidentally cache a dynamic page like the CMS page in your admin section. |
|
|
|
Make sure that you don't accidentally cache a dynamic page like the CMS page in |
|
|
|
your admin section—hard to realize while debugging. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To demonstrate the performance increase of this method, I restarted my web server (clearing the cache) and ran |
|
|
|
a speed test which ran three trials. The first two trials were slow since the server didn't cache anything. However, |
|
|
|
the third trial ran extreamly fast since all the contents were in the server's cache. |
|
|
|
To demonstrate the performance increase of this method, I restarted my web |
|
|
|
server (clearing the cache) and ran a speed test which ran three trials. The |
|
|
|
first two trials were slow since the server didn't have anything in its cache. |
|
|
|
However, the third trial ran extreamly fast since all the contents were in the |
|
|
|
server's cache. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Server Cache Example](media/websiteOptimization/serverCache.png) |
|
|
|
![Server Cache Example](media/3e2e138f85024c1a96ba0ad55bc5d2ed.png) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 5: Enable Compression |
|
|
|
Server Cache Example |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compressing content before it is transferred over the internet can significantly decrease the loading time of your |
|
|
|
website. The only trade off of this approach is that it takes more CPU resources, however, it is well worth it for the |
|
|
|
performance gains. Using Gzip on CSS and html can reduce the size by 60-70%. |
|
|
|
5: Enable Compression |
|
|
|
--------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running an NGINX server, you can enable Gzip there. There is also a simple node module which will |
|
|
|
use Gzip compression on an Express app. |
|
|
|
Compressing content before it is transferred over the internet can significantly |
|
|
|
decrease the loading time of your website. The only trade off from this approach |
|
|
|
is that it takes more CPU resources, however, it is well worth it for the |
|
|
|
performance gains. Using Gzip on CSS and HTML can reduce the size by 60-70%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running an NGINX server, you can enable Gzip there. There is also a |
|
|
|
simple node module which will use Gzip compression on an Express app. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Gzip on Express App |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
npm install compression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var compression = require('compression') |
|
|
|
app.use(compression()); |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 6: Remove Unused CSS Definitions |
|
|
|
If you use a css library like Bootstrap or W3CSS, you will have a ton of css classes which go |
|
|
|
unused. The standard BootStrap css file is around 210kb. After I removed unused CSS definitions |
|
|
|
the size of the BootStrap file was only 16kb. |
|
|
|
6: Remove Unused CSS Definitions |
|
|
|
-------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are tons of tools online, however, for my blog I used PurgeCSS which is a |
|
|
|
node library. |
|
|
|
If you use a CSS library like Bootstrap or W3-CSS, you will have a ton of css |
|
|
|
classes which go unused. The standard BootStrap CSS file is around 210kb. After |
|
|
|
I removed unused CSS definitions the size of the BootStrap file was only 16kb |
|
|
|
for my website. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For my blog I used PurgeCSS which is a node library. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This command will install PurgeCSS for CLI (command line interface). |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
npm i -g purgecss |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an example of how you could use PurgeCSS to remove unused css |
|
|
|
definitions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an example of how you would use PurgeCSS to remove unused css definitions. |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
purgecss --css css/app.css --content src/index.html --out build/css/ |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PurgeCSS CLI options. |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
purgecss --css <css> --content <content> [option] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options: |
|
|
@ -271,40 +305,42 @@ Options: |
|
|
|
[array] [default: []] |
|
|
|
-h, --help Show help [boolean] |
|
|
|
-v, --version Show version number [boolean] |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the ideal solution since some CSS definitions may be used on some pages |
|
|
|
yet unused on other pages. When running this command be sure to select a page which |
|
|
|
uses all of your CSS to prevent loosing some CSS styling on certain pages. |
|
|
|
This is not the ideal solution since some CSS definitions may be used on some |
|
|
|
pages yet unused on other pages. When running this command be sure to select a |
|
|
|
page which uses all your CSS to prevent losing some CSS styling on certain |
|
|
|
pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to use this through the command line, you can run this directly in your |
|
|
|
node app to make this automated. Check out their [documentation](https://www.purgecss.com/) to |
|
|
|
learn more. |
|
|
|
You don't have to use this through the command line, you can run this directly |
|
|
|
in your node app to make it automated. Check out their |
|
|
|
[documentation](https://www.purgecss.com/) to learn more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7: Minify CSS and Javascript |
|
|
|
---------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 7: Minify CSS and Javascript |
|
|
|
This is the easiest thing you can do to reduce the size of your website. You |
|
|
|
just run your CSS and JavaScript through a program which strips out all |
|
|
|
unnecessary characters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is possibly the easiest thing you can do to reduce the size of your website. |
|
|
|
Essentially you just run your CSS and JavaScript through a program which strips out |
|
|
|
all unnecessary characters. |
|
|
|
Ex of Minified CSS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ex Of Minified CSS: |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
.bg-primary{background-color:#3B536B!important}#mainNav{font-family:Montserrat,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;padding-top:15px;padding-bottom:15px}#mainNav .navbar-nav{letter-spacing:1px}#mainNav .navbar-nav li.nav-item a.nav-link{color:#fff}#mainNav .navbar-nav li.nav-item a.nav-link:hover{color:#D2C0FF;outline:0}#mainNav .navbar-toggler{font-size:14px;padding:11px;text-transform:uppercase;color:#fff;border-color:#fff}.navbar-toggler{padding:.25rem .75rem;font-size:1.09375rem;line-height:1;background-color:transparent;border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:.25rem}.table .thead-dark{color:#fff;background-color:#513E7D;border-color:#32383e}footer{color:#fff}footer h3{margin-bottom:30px}footer .footer-above{padding-top:50px;background-color:#3B536B}footer .footer-col{margin-bottom:50px}footer .footer-below{padding:25px 0;background-color:#3B536B} |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are Node libraries which can minify CSS and Javascript, however, if you are really |
|
|
|
lazy, just use a website like [this](https://cssminifier.com/). |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are Node libraries which can minify CSS and Javascript, however, if you |
|
|
|
are lazy, just use a website like [this](https://cssminifier.com/). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 8: Keep Minimal JavaScript |
|
|
|
8: Keep Minimal JavaScript |
|
|
|
-------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignoring the amount of Node dependencies you have, it is critical to minimize |
|
|
|
the amount of dependencies the client needs. I was able to completely remove |
|
|
|
BootStrap's javascript and Jquery by simply writing a javascript function for my nav bar. |
|
|
|
This reduced the size of my website by 100kb. |
|
|
|
Ignoring the gross amount of Node dependencies you have, it is critical to |
|
|
|
minimize the amount of dependencies the client needs. I completely removed |
|
|
|
BootStrap's JavaScript and jQuery from my blog by simply writing a javascript |
|
|
|
function for my nav bar. This reduced the size of my website by 100kb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
const e = document.querySelector(".navbar-toggler"); |
|
|
|
const t = document.querySelector(".navbar-collapse"); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -321,20 +357,23 @@ e.onclick = function() |
|
|
|
t.classList.add('collapse'); |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should also debate how much you need 3rd party scripts like Google Analytics. |
|
|
|
In most cases people don't full take advantage of Google Analytics, a simple backend analytics |
|
|
|
service would work just as good while saving the client load time. |
|
|
|
You should debate how much you need 3rd party scripts like Google Analytics. In |
|
|
|
most cases people don't full take advantage of Google Analytics, a simple |
|
|
|
backend analytics service would work just as good while saving the client load |
|
|
|
time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Resources |
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
--------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Pingdom Speed Test](https://tools.pingdom.com/) |
|
|
|
- [Google Website Speed Test](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/) |
|
|
|
- [Code to My "Optimized" Node Blog](https://github.com/jrtechs/NodeJSBlog) |
|
|
|
- [Purge CSS](https://www.purgecss.com/) |
|
|
|
- [CSS and JavaScript Minifier](https://www.minifier.org/) |
|
|
|
- [Pingdom Speed Test](https://tools.pingdom.com/) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Google Website Speed |
|
|
|
Test](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Code to My "Optimized" Node Blog](https://github.com/jrtechs/NodeJSBlog) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Purge CSS](https://www.purgecss.com/) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [CSS and JavaScript Minifier](https://www.minifier.org/) |