diff --git a/blogContent/posts/data-science/is-using-ml-for-antivirus-safe.md b/blogContent/posts/data-science/is-using-ml-for-antivirus-safe.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d950c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blogContent/posts/data-science/is-using-ml-for-antivirus-safe.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+In this blog post I want to examine the ways in which anti virus programs currently employ machine learning and then go into the potential pitfalls that ML bring.
+
+# ML In the Antivirus Industry
+
+Most current maleware detection falls into two broad categories: static and dynamic analysis.
+Static analysis looks at the program without actually running the code.
+Static analysis typically looks at things like the file fingerprint, virus scanning, reverse engineering, memory artifacts, packer detection, and debugging. 
+Static analysis also encompasses looking up the hashes of the virus against a known database of viruses.
+However, it is super easy to fool signature based malware detection using simple obfuscation methods.
+Dynamic analysis is a technique where you run the program in a sandbox and monitor all the actions that the virus takes.
+If you notice that the program is acting suspicious -ie changing the registry or making suspicious API calls- it is likely a virus.
+
+Antivirus detection is very difficult, but, probably not for the reasons you think
+The issue isn't writing programs which can detect these static or dynamic properties of viruses, that is the easy part.
+It is also relatively easy to determine a general rule set for what makes a virus a virus.
+You can easily whitelist suspicious domains, determine that certain file fingerprints hashes, and behaviours are virus like.
+
+The real problem is that there are hundreds of thousands of maleware applications and more are created every day.
+Not only are there tons of pesky maleware applications, there is an absurd amount of normal programs which we don't want maleware applications to block.  
+It is impossible for a small team of maleware researchers to create a definitive set of heuristics which can correctly identify all maleware programs.
+
+This is where we turn to the field of Machine Learning.
+Humans are bad with big data, but, computers absolutely love big data.
+Most antivirus companies use machine learning and it has been a large success so far because it has allowed us to dramatically improve our ability to detect zero day viruses.
+
+## Interesting Examples
+
+### Cylance
+
+[Cylance](https://www.cylance.com) uses supervised learning and static analysis to classify files as being maleware. This product pulls a list of attributes from the file which they can then compare against other known viruses.
+
+### MalwareBytes Anomalous
+
+[Anomalous](https://blog.malwarebytes.com/detections/machinelearning-anomalous-100/) is a machine learning application which simply flags files which appear different from their training set of known normal files.
+This does not attempt to classify what makes a virus a virus, but, what makes a normal program a normal program.
+Anything which is not a normal program, it alerts you about since it is probably a virus.
+
+### Kaspersky
+
+Kaspersky appears to have a ton of research into using machine learning for maleware detection.
+I would highly recommend that you read their [white paper](https://media.kaspersky.com/en/enterprise-security/Kaspersky-Lab-Whitepaper-Machine-Learning.pdf) on this subject.
+
+# Why is this a problem?
+
+It turns out that machine learning systems can be easily fooled by using [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_adversarial_network). Essentially what this boils down to is that you have two 
\ No newline at end of file